
When it comes to temporary accommodation for project teams with separate apartments, it is not just about a place to sleep. For weeks or months at another place of work, the accommodation has to function in everyday life: for rest periods, phone calls, arrival, handovers, and internal coordination within the team.
A shared team apartment and several separate apartments meet these requirements in different ways. A shared apartment brings everyone together in one place. Separate apartments distribute the people across several units and thereby create more distance between the respective daily routines. Which option fits better therefore depends less on a general rule than on the project logic: How closely does the team work together? Are there shift changes? Do people need to work concentrated in the apartment? Do they all arrive at the same time?
The first question is not how large the team is, but how similar the working style is. If everyone has the same working hours, leaves in the morning at the same time, and returns in the evening in a similar way, a shared team apartment can be a good fit organizationally. In that case, the advantage often outweighs everything else: everyone is directly reachable and can coordinate quickly in everyday life.
As soon as the deployment times differ, the calculation changes. A team with early and late shifts, changing construction site sections, or several specialist roles often does not have the same routines. Then it is of little use if everyone lives at the same address but has to constantly take different daily rhythms into account in everyday life. In such cases, several single apartments for teams can be the better structure because they allow more flexibility for different routines.
A practical example: A small project team with a shared daily plan can be accommodated sensibly in a team apartment. Another team, in which 2 people work at night and 2 prepare meetings during the day, benefits more from separate units. So it is not the number of people that matters, but the question of whether the living arrangement fits the working reality.

Privacy is not only a comfort issue for project staff. It affects whether people can truly recover after a long day at work. In a shared apartment, several people share bedrooms, kitchen, and often also retreat areas. That can work if everyone has similar habits. But it quickly becomes exhausting if light, noise, and use of the communal areas constantly overlap.
Especially for longer assignments, it is therefore worth making an honest assessment: Does someone really need quiet after the shift? Do phone calls or short coordination talks need to be held in the apartment? Are there people who get up very early while others are still sleeping? The more often such overlaps occur, the more likely separate apartments are to make sense.
The degree of independence is also important here. In several apartments, each person can better control their own daily routine. This not only reduces conflicts, but also the constant need to coordinate small everyday matters such as lighting, visiting hours, or the shared use of kitchen areas.
For project teams, the accommodation is often more than a place to sleep. Documents need to be sorted, emails answered, shift schedules checked, or technical details followed up. Anyone doing this in the apartment needs a quiet setting and as little disturbance as possible from other team members.
In a team apartment, even a single phone call can affect the rest of the group. If several people are working, making calls, or preparing for the next working day at the same time, the shared room quickly becomes used twice: as living space and as workspace. That is only unproblematic if the use is clearly coordinated.
With separate apartments, this burden is distributed. The individual person can combine working times and rest periods more easily without having to constantly take other people's routines into account. This is especially helpful when the project is not only about living there, but also about actually working in a focused way. Anyone preparing meetings in the evening or needing to be reachable online early in the morning usually benefits from a clearly separated living area.
A common practical case in projects is staggered arrival. Not everyone arrives on the same day, some travel from different regions, and others join the team later. This is exactly where it becomes clear whether the accommodation structure matches reality.
In a shared apartment, arrival has to be coordinated especially carefully: Who has the key? Who accepts the first handover on site? Who documents defects or questions? If these points are not determined in advance, time for queries and coordination is quickly lost. Several separate apartments can ease this situation because arrival and handover can be clearly assigned to individual people or groups.
For team coordination, it is also important whether the accommodation can be organized easily internally. If a project uses several units, a clear division of roles can help: One person handles communication with the accommodation, another the travel chain, and a third the documentation. In this way, the accommodation does not become an additional stress factor alongside the actual project.

When comparing a team apartment with several individual apartments, it is not enough to look only at the visible accommodation price. For the decision, what matters is how transparently the total costs can be presented. This includes, for example, the internal assignment of the units, possible additional effort for separate invoices, cleaning arrangements, and the organizational effort around arrival and handover.
A shared apartment may appear simpler at first glance because only one unit has to be organized. Several apartments, on the other hand, can be clearer in billing if people or subteams are to be assigned unambiguously. The decisive factor is which structure is already specified in the company or by the client. If costs have to be documented internally by employees, construction site sections, or teams, a divided accommodation solution can improve oversight.
The location also belongs in this cost consideration. An accommodation is not only suitable when it is spatially appropriate, but also when it fits the place of work, the working hours, and the daily routes. Anyone who thinks about the location, accessibility, and division of the units together avoids later corrections.
Serviced apartments and apartment hotels can be just as useful for longer projects as a classic apartment if the equipment and processes fit. What matters is not the label alone, but whether privacy, services, location, and the team’s daily rhythm match.
Some project teams mainly need a clear retreat with their own living area. Others also benefit from organizational services or a structure that can simplify arrival and stay. Hotels can also be a suitable option in such constellations if the location, services, and transparent total cost structure match the project requirements. The important thing is therefore the concrete comparison of the options, not a general classification of one type of accommodation.
myroom24 is an online booking platform on which commercial accommodation providers offer accommodation for private and business users. Through the platform, various types of accommodation can be checked, including rooms, apartments, and houses in commercial accommodation facilities such as hotels, hostels, serviced apartments, and holiday apartments.
For project teams, it is particularly relevant that the destination and length of stay can be specified. Available long-term accommodations can then be filtered according to criteria such as price, location, and equipment. For this form of planning, the long-term stays offered via myroom24 from 28 to 179 nights are important because they are precisely tailored to medium project periods.
If an accommodation is marked as instant booking, it can be booked without prior approval from the host when available. This is especially helpful when the project is already fixed and only needs to be checked which unit has the desired layout, location, and equipment.
Before making an inquiry, the project team should put the requirements in writing. A short list with points that do not need to be decided later on the fly is useful:
A brief practical picture helps with classification: If a project team consists of people with different shifts and 2 of them regularly work in the evening while others start early, a shared apartment is usually quickly overfilled. If, on the other hand, everyone is on duty at the same time and mainly needs short distances within one unit, the team apartment can work well.
Anyone who clarifies the checklist early does not decide by feeling, but based on the concrete processes of the project. For the next search, a systematic start via the myroom24 accommodation is worthwhile.
If the team has similar working hours, coordinates closely, and short distances within one unit are more important than retreat and separate routines.
Separate apartments are especially useful when sleeping times differ, several people need quiet at the same time, or work has to be done in the apartment.
It is important who uses which unit, how the costs are internally assigned, and whether documentation should be done by person or by subteam.
Then arrival windows, key handover, contact persons, and the assignment to the respective apartments should be defined in advance.